Sharia Law and the Kafir (or non Muslim)

Sharia Law and the Kafir (or non Muslim)

The Kafir in Islam

In the article that follows Dr. Bill Warner gives a very clear rendition of what Islam teaches concerning the kafir – is taken from the below book.

Sharia Law for Non-Muslims Chapter 5-The Kafir

Until now we have looked at the big picture of Sharia and then the position of women in Sharia. We now come to a new subject–the unbeliever or non-Muslim. The word “non-Muslim” is used in the translation of Sharia law, but the actual Arabic word used is “Kafir”. But the word Kafir means far more than non-Muslim. The original meaning of the word was “concealer”, one who conceals the truth of Islam.

The Koran says that the Kafir may be deceived, plotted against, hated, enslaved, mocked, tortured and worse. The word is usually translated as “unbeliever” but this translation is wrong. The word “unbeliever” is logically and emotionally neutral, whereas, Kafir is the most abusive, prejudiced and hateful word in any language.

There are many religious names for Kafirs: polytheists, idolaters, People of the Book (Christians and Jews), Buddhists, atheists, agnostics, and pagans. Kafir covers them all, because no matter what the religious name is, they can all be treated the same. What Mohammed said and did to polytheists can be done to any other category of Kafir.

Islam devotes a great amount of energy to the Kafir. The majority (64%) of the Koran is devoted to the Kafir, and nearly all of the Sira (81%) deals with Mohammed’s struggle with them. The Hadith (Traditions) devotes 32% of the text to Kafirs1. Overall, the Trilogy devotes 60% of its content to the Kafir.

Hadith 37%
Sira 81%
Koran 64%
Total 60%

Amount of Text Devoted to the Kafir

The Sharia does not devote nearly that much to the Kafir since Sharia law is primarily for Muslims. Besides, the Kafir has few rights, so there is little to expound on.

Religious Islam is what Muslims do to go to Paradise and avoid Hell. What Mohammed did to Kafirs was not religious, but political. Political Islam is what is of concern to Kafirs, not the religion. Who cares how a Muslim worships, but every one of us is concerned as to what they do to us and say about us. Political Islam should be of concern to every Kafir.

Here are two Sharia references about Kafirs:

w59.2 […] And this clarifies the Koranic verses and hadiths about hatred for the sake of Allah and love for the sake of Allah, Al Walaa wa al Baraa, being unyielding towards the Kafirs, hard against them, and detesting them, while accepting the destiny of Allah Most High insofar as it is the decree of Allah Mighty and Majestic.

Hatred for the sake of Allah and love for the sake of Allah is called Al Walaa wa al Baraa, a fundamental principle of Islamic ethics and Sharia. A Muslim is to hate what Allah hates and love what Allah loves. Allah hates the Kafir, therefore, a Muslim is to act accordingly.

40:35 They [Kafirs] who dispute the signs [Koran verses] of Allah without authority having reached them are greatly hated by Allah and the believers [Muslims]. So Allah seals up every arrogant, disdainful heart.

h8.24 It is not permissible to give zakat [charity] to a Kafir, or to someone whom one is obliged to support such as a wife or family member.

Here are a few of the Koran references: A Kafir can be mocked–

83:34 On that day the faithful will mock the Kafirs, while they sit on bridal couches and watch them. Should not the Kafirs be paid back for what they did?

A Kafir can be beheaded

47:4 When you encounter the Kafirs on the battlefield, cut off their heads until you have thoroughly defeated them and then take the prisoners and tie them up firmly.

A Kafir can be plotted against

86:15 They plot and scheme against you [Mohammed], and I plot and scheme against them. Therefore, deal calmly with the Kafirs and leave them alone for a while.

A Kafir can be terrorized

8:12 Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the Kafirs’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fingers!”

A Muslim is not the friend of a Kafir

3:28 Believers should not take Kafirs as friends in preference to other believers. Those who do this will have none of Allah’s protection and will only have themselves as guards. Allah warns you to fear Him for all will return to Him.

A Kafir is evil

23:97 And say: Oh my Lord! I seek refuge with You from the suggestions of the evil ones [Kafirs]. And I seek refuge with you, my Lord, from their presence.

A Kafir is disgraced

37:18 Tell them, “Yes! And you [Kafirs] will be disgraced.”

A Kafir is cursed

33:60 They [Kafirs] will be cursed, and wherever they are found, they will be seized and murdered. It was Allah’s same practice with those who came before them, and you will find no change in Allah’s ways.


Muslims tell Christians and Jews that they are special. They are “People of the Book” and are brothers in the Abrahamic faith. But in Islam you are a Christian, if and only if, you believe that Christ was a man who was a prophet of Allah; there is no Trinity; Jesus was not crucified nor resurrected and that He will return to establish Sharia law. To be a true Jew you must believe that Mohammed is the last in the line of Jewish prophets.

This verse is positive:

5:77 Say: Oh, People of the Book, do not step out of the bounds of truth in your religion, and do not follow the desires of those who have gone wrong and led many astray. They have themselves gone astray from the even way.

Islamic doctrine is dualistic, so there is an opposite view as well. Here is the last verse written about the People of the Book (A later verse abrogates or nullifies an earlier verse.). This is the final word. It calls for Muslims to make war on the People of the Book who do not believe in the religion of truth, Islam.

9:29 Make war on those who have received the Scriptures [Jews and Christians] but do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden. The Christians and Jews do not follow the religion of truth until they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya] and they are humiliated.

The sentence “They do not forbid…” means that they do not accept Sharia law; “until they submit” means to submit to Sharia law. Christians and Jews who do not accept Mohammed as the final prophet are Kafirs.

Muslims pray five times a day and the opening prayer always includes:

Koran 1: 7 Not the path of those who anger You [the Jews] nor the path of those who go astray [the Christians].


Since the original Arabic word for unbelievers was Kafir and that is the actual word used in the Koran and Sharia law, that is the word used here for accuracy and precision.

It is very simple: if you don’t believe Mohammed and his Koran, you are a Kafir.

Publication notice: this book is now available to buy on our website HERE.
You can see the entire book on pdf HERE.

Bill Warner, Center for the Study of Political Islam
Copyright © 2010 CBSX, LLC Use and distribute as you wish; do not edit and give us credit.

Religion of Peace



The Truth about Christians Among the Refugees

The Truth about Christians Among the Refugees

    The Truth about Christians Among the Refugees

    Executive summary
    A female interpreter of Eritrean origin, who lives in Germany and of whom neither the Muslim migrants nor the locally hired Muslims know that she is a Christian, revealed what she experienced in refugee shelters in Germany:
    Adult Muslim migrants threaten and physically attack Christian and Yazidi refugees.
    Muslim migrant kids do not play with Christian refugee kids, then they explain that they hate them, just like their parents do.
    Locally hired Muslim interpreters and security men seem integrated on the outside, they grew up in Germany, went to German schools and have jobs, but when they are among themselves, they reveal their true colors by stating that Germany must be Islamized, and that they disdain Germany and its values.
    In mosques in Germany, pure hate is preached against people of other religions.
    Muslim migrant women want to outbreed Christians, because they want to annihilate them.
    German aid organizations and Christian politicians have confirmed her words with their own experience. They also added that Muslim interpreters intentionally mistranslate the words of Christian refugees to make them unable to obtain asylum, cover up Muslim mobbing on Christians, and arbitrarily move Christians to the end of the charity recipients’ list.
    Source and German-to-English translation
    14 November 2016, 10:00
    Unerkannt in Flüchtlingsheimen: Was Christen alles erleben
    November 14, 2016 10:00
    Incognito in refugee shelters: Everything Christians live through
    What a Christian female interpreter hears in shelters, is terrifying. An article by idea editor-in-chief Daniela Städter.

    Wetzlar (

    Only 14 per cent of refugees who filed for asylum in Germany in 2015 were Christians – over 73 per cent are Muslims. Recently, there have been aggravated reports by Christians about discrimination by Muslims in refugee accommodations. Even some Muslim interpreters and security duty coworkers would put pressure on Christians. A Christian female interpreter observes this, but she is not detected as a Christian. What she hears in the shelters, is terrifying. An article by idea editor-in-chief Daniela Städter.

    In September 2016, the call of a long-standing German top female politician reaches the Evangelical News Agency idea (in Wetzlar). She has contact to a female Christian engaged in refugee assistance, who could tell controversial things about the situation in German refugee shelters. Nevertheless, the name of the woman shall not be mentioned. Subsequently, a discussion takes place in Wetzlar among the female politician, an expert in the field of refugee issues, and the 39-year-old Christian female interpreter originating from Eritrea. She speaks Arabic fluently and has already worked in various refugee shelters as an interpreter – mostly only with Muslim colleagues. The woman acts “undercover” at it. Nobody suspects that she is Christian. The native-born Eritrean fled for Germany in 1991 on her own. She is thankful that she was taken in openly in her new homeland and was supported in many ways. Later she wants to give something back and begins to help in refugee shelters five years ago or so in an honorary capacity. She has been active mainly as an interpreter since the summer of 2016. That she is Christian, she has not mentioned it in the accommodations since the beginning. Because of her knowledge of the Arabic language, she notices quickly: “Christians are getting subjugated, intimidated and harassed by Muslim refugees. That is usual.” Often nobody realizes the mobbing, by which Yazidis and homosexual refugees are affected, too.

    “Germany must be Islamized”
    Security duty coworkers and interpreters are, according to her data, almost always Muslims. They make, says the 39-year-old, a very nice impression at the first glance: “Most of them grew up here, often studied, have esteemed occupations, and they behave open-mindedly.” However, that changes as soon as they are “among themselves”: “Then they show their true colors and say sentences like ‘Germany must be Islamized’. They disdain our country and our values.” The young woman is appalled, and for a long time she does not want to take this for real. She still withholds that she is Christian in order to learn more. Among other things, she visits the Quran courses of various mosques: “There, pure hate is preached against people of other religions. The kids get that here, in Germany, taught to them from an early age.” It is similar in the refugee shelters. She notices how Muslim boys refuse to play with Christians. The female interpreter tries to mediate: “You are Muslim, he is Christian. What difference does it make?” The five-year-olds answer her: “With the Christians, I do not play. My parents hate them, too.” The female interpreter becomes frightened: “They fled from the war to Germany and should be happy after all, that a Christian country takes them in.”
    We, Muslims must get more kids than the Christians

    She also tries to establish contact with the Muslim women. Many of them, despite their young age, have already had multiple kids. She cautiously wants to enlighten them about contraception methods. “After that, some women told me: We want to multiply. We must get more kids than the Christians. Only this way can we annihilate them.” As she objects and says that it is, after all, the Christians who help them, she bumps into rejection. Helping the Christians is a sin.

    The might of the interpreters
    The European Mission Community (in Penkun, Vorpommern) has lived through the might of the Muslim interpreters, too. Its chairman, Frank Seidler reports that at the hearings at the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees, they sometimes falsely rendered the testimonies of Christian refugees within the asylum process. That is why now, a Persian-speaking coworker is accompanying the refugees to the interviews, so that he can directly intervene in an emergency: “Since then it has been running better.” Seidler tells further about an Afghan having converted to Christianity, who was beaten up in his collective accommodations and was injured very severely. After he was helped to press charges, there were immediately countercharges by multiple Muslim refugees. The process is still running, although he counts with cessation, because testimony stands against testimony: “Unfortunately, we have already gone through this lapse often.” But where this leads is that the attackers think that they could allow themselves everything in Germany and would never be held accountable, so says Seidler.

    A permanent pressure burdens Christians
    The Christian aid organization Open Doors (in Kelkheim at Frankfurt am Main) makes similar observations. It is often hard to prove incidents. “With the incidents, it is not always about violence”, says the coordinator of public relations, Ado Greve, “but rather about forms of discrimination, for example at food distribution, or about threats. A permanent pressure burdens the Christians – especially the converted ones.” When a Christian is being threatened in his mother tongue in the corridor, “We cut through your neck!”, or “We will rape your wife!”, then it triggers great fear. Greve: “The religious features imprinted by Islam in their homeland are often brought with by the perpetrators. However, to prove that, it is hard in most cases.” But it should not lead to that the incidents are not taken seriously: “It is important to give credit to the reports of the affected Christians.”

    When Muslims translate falsely
    Also from the point of view of the leader of the refugee-related work group within the Central Council of Oriental Christians in Germany, Paulus Kurt (in Munich), false translations by Muslim interpreters are a problem. From the refugees whom he advises, he makes them hand over the filled hearing questionnaires after the interview date at the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees in order to verify them together with the Christian asylum seekers. Sometimes the data of religion are false there – from an Aramean Christian, for example, becomes an Arabic Muslim. The flight reasons, too, are rendered partially inaccurately and to the disadvantage of the questioned Christians. If they notice this, they file an objection within the legal deadline of two weeks. Nevertheless, many refugees did not even know the expiration date at all, and thus passed the deadlines.

    Christians often have no knowledge of their rights
    According to Kurt, asylum seekers also have the right for a retranslation of the questionnaire filled in German to their mother tongue. However, some interpreters did not inform the Christians about that at all. By contrast, the interpreters communicated to the coworkers of the Federal Office that the questioned one has waived the retranslation. “By that, the chance of Christians to get a long-term recognition for asylum here drops.” In the accommodations, too, the language barrier is a problem: “There, a Christian gets beaten by a Muslim, because he is eating pork in the communal kitchen – and the interpreter relays to the leadership afterwards that there was merely a general altercation about the use of the kitchen.”

    What nobody realizes
    According to the data by two Hessian female refugee helpers of the Central Council of Oriental Christians in Germany, it is also often about forms of discrimination in the accommodations, which go on in the background without being noticed. They name, for example, the issuance of articles of clothing. The maintainer of the accommodations provides a list with refugees who should get clothes. The slip of paper is passed to the interpreters who organize the issuance in the respective languages. At the readout, the list gets changed by them. Whoever has a Christian name, will be called at the end, and must take potluck with the rest, they say: “Nobody realizes that.”

    The state assumes false preconditions
    From the point of view of auditor Thomas Günster (in Fulda) engaged in refugee-related work, it is about a system error. The state assumes integration in the case of Muslim interpreters, most of them having grown up in Germany, toward the local value system, but that has not happened at all. Günster, who stands in close contact with Hessian refugee helpers and supports them at their work, says: “A sort of independence is assumed here, which is not there at all.” Rethinking must happen here.

    There are positive developments in Hessen
    Meanwhile, there have been positive developments, too, means Günster, who is also the chairman of the Diocesan Group Fulda of the Association of Catholic Entrepreneurs (BKU). Thus the Hessian Ministry of the Interior strives to protect religious minorities from abuses. In addition, too, the teams in the scope of security duty and interpreters should be staffed in the future with coworkers of different religious affiliations: “Minorities among the refugees must be protected and their complaints taken seriously. We must pay attention that the Christian refugees in Germany do not go to the dogs anymore.”

    It looks worse in Bremen

    The situation in Bremen is worse. There, the City Senate adopted a new Protection Against Violent Acts concept for refugee facilities at the end of October [2016]. In it, however, they did not go into the situation of Christian refugees. The target group of the Protection Against Violence Acts concept is girls, women, and persons who, due to their sexual or gender identity, are particularly threatened by violence. The alderwoman in the Bremen City Assembly, Sigrid Grönert (CDU) [Christian-Democratic Union, a German political party] basically welcomes the concept indeed, but already pointed out in May that beyond that, Christians also feel mobbed by Muslims over and over again.
    By contrast, the Bremen City Senate stated in February that “no abuses” on religious minorities are known. Grönert: “That, unfortunately, does not correspond to reality.” According to their own data for the time frame between January 2015 and June 2016, nine cases of bodily abuses in Bremen were reported to Open Doors.

    Christians do not press charges out of fear
    None of the affected Syrian Christians has pressed charges – out of fear, that the situation could get worse. That abuses are not known to the authorities, simply does not mean that they do not exist, emphasizes Grönert, who is also the assistant chairman of the Evangelical Workgroup of the CDU in Bremen: “It is a pity that the issue is not being taken up over here at us, while a Federal Province like Hessen has recognized the problems. I wish that the issue were taken seriously by politics across the Federation [i.e. Germany].” She is not alone with this wish. Professor Heiner Bielefeldt, UN special rapporteur for freedom of religion and world view, incumbent till the end of October [2016], demanded at the beginning of November an honest discussion about the hints of abuses against Christian refugees in asylum accommodations. It would be a big mistake of politics to spread the cloak of silence over it, said Professor Bielefeldt.

    Hijra – doctrine of Islamic Migration

    Hijra – doctrine of Islamic Migration

    Hijra – doctrine of Islamic Migration

    Understanding the dangers of large scale Islamic Migration

    Western political elites, aided and abated by mainstream media, are stubbornly clinging on to the narrative that large scale Islamic migration will not change Western societies because Western societies are already multicultural.  Thus Islamic migration will only strengthen the nature of our multicultural societies.  Putting aside the failed, grand multicultural experiment.

    Putting aside the failed, grand multicultural experiment, political Islam does not tolerate multiculturalism.  It does not tolerate it because Islam is supremacist and totalitarian in nature.   Political Islam will use the Western doctrine of multiculturalism to its own ends but it does not support multiculturalism.

    Dr. Bill Warner on Islamic Migration – Hijra

    In this thirty minute video Dr. Warner deals very clearly with the issues around the mass Islamic migration that we are now seeing into the West.  To understand the issues around Islamic mass migration is probably the single most important issue to face our generation.  Yet the dilemma is not concerned  with individual Muslims but with Political Islam.  Islam is political ideology which has a religious aspect to it, but it is not the religious aspect of Islam that is a danger to us, it is its political aspects that are dangerous to Western Civilisation.  This is how we should look at Islam.

    Dr. Warner states:

    As it does with everything in life, Islam has its own views about migration. For us migration is for an individual’s gain—a better job, for instance. But for Islam, migration was the beginning of Mohammed’s success. He preached the religion for 13 years and converted 150 Arabs to Islam. After he migrated to Medina, he became and politician and jihadist, which led to every Arab in Arabia becoming a Muslim.

    After Mohammed’s death, Islam exploded out of Arabia in its second migration. When Islam settles into a society, the society becomes all Islamic (with a couple of exceptions—Spain and the Balkans). Islam does not assimilate, but dominates. This is because of its Sharia law.

    The purpose of migration is to start jihad and the purpose of jihad is install the Sharia. Under the Sharia, the other religions are subjected to taxes, domination and humiliation. After enough time, everyone will become a Muslim.

    Today in the West, we see the beginning of the annihilation of our civilization due to the deference we pay to Islamic migration and Sharia and we refuse to see the true nature and goals of Islam—complete domination of all aspects of our society.

    Originally posted 2016-09-05 14:18:26. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

    Five reasons a Muslim should not apologise for Islamic terrorist attacks

    Five reasons a Muslim should not apologise for Islamic terrorist attacks

    Muslims should never apologise for Islamic terrorism

    Omar Alnatour maintains that Muslims should never have to apologise for Islamic terrorism and gives us five reasons why a Muslim should never have to apologise for Islamic terrorism.  It seems such a ridiculous position to take yet it is a narrative that we hear nearly on a daily basis and certainly after each murderous Islamic attack.

    Acknowledge, Don’t Apologise

    One of my favourite speakers on Islam is  Dr.Bill Warner gives us the above response to this article.  I want to share Dr. Warner’s video response to this article as it destroys it completely.  The video is only 6 1/2 minutes long but well worth viewing.  What I like about Dr. Warner is that he is always calm and collected and full of amazing facts.  You pick these up in his longer videos and his focus is always go back to Muhammed and his knowledge of Muhammed’s life and Islamic history is amazing.

    Originally posted 2016-08-13 01:57:22. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

    Totalitarian Islam – Dr Bill Warner

    Totalitarian Islam – Dr Bill Warner

    The real nature of Islam

    There is so much debate on the real nature of Islam with the political elite of the Western world telling us it is a religion and one that at its core is peaceful, tolerant and beneficial to mankind.  Yet this is as far away from the truth as one can get.

    In this short five and a half minute video Dr. Bill Warner gives a concise explanation of the true nature of Islam.  The religious aspects of Islam is only a small part of what it  is as a whole.  Dr. Warner describes Islam as Political Islam and it is, in reality, a political system that has a religious aspect to it.  As he points out in this video, it is a totalitarian system that bodes no opposition or dissent and will not be satisfied until everyone bends the knee.

    Totalitarianism is a political doctrine that seeks to control all aspects of a society, its economy, its laws and government, its culture.

    Islam is a complete way of life, a total civilization, not just a religion. It is also a culture and a political system of Sharia laws which establish its supremacy. There is no aspect of personal and public life that is not included in the Sharia.

    Not just Muslims but all people must submit to the Sharia. The very name, Islam, means to submit, submit to Mohammed and the Koran in all things: religious, political and cultural.

    Mohammed practiced totalitarianism. All people around him had to submit to his demands. After Arabia submitted, Mohammed left Arabia and began his mission to have Sharia rule the world.

    Both the Koran and Mohammed command the terror of jihad on non-Muslims or Kafirs until Islam dominates. After Mohammed died, the caliphs killed all apostates and conquered all the Middle East and northern Africa.

    After Islam enters a society, over time, the society becomes totally Islamic. This is totalitarianism.

    The problem with our political elites is that they do not recognise the true nature of Political Islam.  Thus they are ready to embrace it (in the sense of tolerating it and letting it grow within the host society), and by embracing it they doom their own societies to total submission to Islam.  Recognising this is vital to the survival of Western Civilisation.


    Originally posted 2016-09-03 22:06:32. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

    Islam’s disproportionate influence in and on the West

    Islam’s disproportionate influence in and on the West

    Islam and the Left

    I watched with interest the whole issue today concerning islamophobia lead by the BBC: Islamophobic tweets ‘peaked in July’.  

    Carl Miller, a research director at the left-of-centre think tank, said the tweets were worrying as they were examples not of people “being angry at Islamic State, [but] people who are being angry at the wider Muslim world”.

    He described such posts as “damaging, harmful, and tremendously problematic”, but added that – in UK law – “only a thin sliver of them are actually illegal”.

    “Only when there’s an actual threat to life are people actually breaking the law, and therefore the people that are in the online space are actually far less protected than the offline space when it comes to receiving that kind of abuse.”

    The BBC article quotes Twitter:

    A spokesperson from Twitter said: “Our rules prohibit inciting or engaging in the targeted abuse or harassment of others.

    “We are continuing to invest heavily in improving our tools and enforcement systems to better allow us to identify and take faster action on abuse as it’s happening and prevent repeat offenders.”

    If Twitter was impartial the above would be fantastic but, like mainstream media, social media is biased towards Islam.  Yet our war will be won or lost against an ideology and not against individuals.  It is the barbaric ideology of Islam that we need to totally discredit so that its facilitators in Europe will be forced to abandon their support of it and recognise its true nature.

    This illustrates why Islam has such a disproportionate influence in Europe (and to a certain degree in the US).  The drive for multiculturalism has been driven by the left because they have an inherent dislike, bordering on hatred (and real hatred in some cases), of Western Civilisation.   Thus the left and Islam are natural bedfellows and explains their alliance,an alliance supported by mainstream media.

    The real enemy to Western freedoms is the left wing

    The reality of Europe (including the UK) is that Islam would be nothing without the facilitation of the left.  Islamic ideology could be easily crushed morally and  intellectually if it stood alone.  Despite its barbarity worldwide it is painted as this beautiful and peaceful religion by our political elite, our left wing media and intelligentsia (although they have given up the right to be called such because they have surrendered completely to political correctness, with critical thought and enquiry quickly disappearing from our universities).  Even so-called conservatives like May, the British PrimeMinister, runs to the defence of Islam calling it a religion of peace and maintaining that sharia (the antithesis of democracy and freedom) can benefit British citizens.

    Recently I introduced Dr Bill Warner and here is another of his videos (lasts about 34 minutes).  In it he deals with political Islam and how it is facilitated by the left.  As usual, he is a plain speaker and has some of this for those of us that maintain we want to preserve our culture and way of life.  As he points out if we feel our culture is worth saving then we need to be willing to fight for it.  If Europeans want something bad enough, it will happen and this includes the rejection and defeat of this barbaric 7th-century ideology.

    Yet in order to achieve this, we must counteract the left’s narrative as this is what is really facilitating the advance of Islam in Europe. Militarily Islam is not a match for Europe but we are being slowly destroyed from within. The real battle is with the ideology of the left and their rejection of Europe’s historical heritage.  Yet Europe’s historical heritage has given us our civilisation that we have at the moment with all its benefits and freedoms.

    Originally posted 2016-08-18 22:47:27. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

    Five Truths About Sharia – Dr. Bill Warner

    Five Truths About Sharia – Dr. Bill Warner

    A man worth following

    I want to use this subject to introduce Dr. Bill Warner.  Here is his bio from his website Political Islam.  I have said before one of the roles of this site is to bring information and resources on the issue of political Islam to as wide an audience as possible. (more…)

    Originally posted 2016-08-11 16:09:06. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

    Understanding and Reasoning about Islam

    Understanding and Reasoning about Islam

    Reasoning about Islam

    Sep 27 2016 | by

    In reasoning about Islam, the first key is do not use the Koran and Allah, because the Koran is structured to be hard to understand. Instead, use the Sunna of Mohammed. The Koran says 91 times that Mohammed is the perfect Muslim and he is very easy to understand. We find Mohammed in his traditions, the Hadith, and his biography, the Sira.

    When we use Mohammed to explain Islam, we do what the Koran commands. Some Muslims might say that a particular hadith may not valid (meaning they don’t like what it says), but know that almost every hadith that I use is called Sahih (authentic), since I use Bukhari and Abu Muslim.

    Sometimes you meet a Muslim who rejects all of the Sunna, so how do you use Mohammed? Simple, the Koran by itself cannot be understood by any person, without knowing the life of Mohammed. No Mohammed equals no understanding of the Koran.

    Actually, there is an oddity about the Koran. It is said to be the perfect, exact words of Allah. However, the perfect Koran cannot be understood without knowing Mohammed. However, the life of Mohammed and his traditions were written by people who never met him, but wrote down what they heard from others. In a court of law, this is called hearsay. Hearsay is usually not admissible in our courts. So the perfect book cannot be understood without evidence that cannot be used in our courts. Odd, isn’t it?

    Originally posted 2016-09-28 00:16:25. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

    The Two Kinds of Dhimmis

    The Two Kinds of Dhimmis

    By Jamie Glazov

    Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Bill Warner, the director of the Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) and spokesman for

    FP: Bill Warner, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

    Warner: Jamie, thank you for inviting me.

    FP: I would like to discuss the issue of dhimmis today. Let’s begin like this: who are the dhimmis? And what different kinds are there?


    Clinton’s borderless world

    Clinton’s borderless world

    Sharia and the destruction of Western Civilisation

    What has disappointed in the recent Presidential debates is the total lack of focus on Clinton’s open border policy.   Hopefully it will come up in the third debate as this is one of the most significant dangers that is facing the West today.  Clinton stated that she is committed to a borderless society and plans to introduce 65,000 Syrian refugees next year (just the start) into America.  They are already flooding into Europe in an unstoppable tide (unstoppable because the European elite does not have the will to stop it.  Easter European countries like Hungry and Poland are saying no to this tide because they recognise the dangers.

    Easter European countries like Hungry and Poland are saying no to this tide because they recognise the dangers. The UK are saying no to it because of BREXIT but voices within the political elite (Jeremy Corbyn the Labour leader for example).  Clinton sets Merkel in Germany as an example to follow and someone she admires – her favourite world leader no less.  Merkel, Corbyn and Clinton will plunge the West into a battle for identity never seen before in our history.  Western Europe is now seeing the fruits of Merkel’s open border policy and if the current trend continues Europe is on course for major cultural conflict.  Yet this seems to be what the left wants, as their hatred for the West’s cultural roots seems unbounded.  Roots that are grounded in Judeo-Christian values.

    Jihad is terrible but not the main danger we face

    The more you read about Islamic history the more you realise that the real danger in mass Islamic migration is the imposition of sharia law.  It is sharia that destroys cultures and a people’s identity.  Dr Warners short video illustrates this and should lead us to look at the subject in more detail.

    As Syrian refugees and other migrants are being brought to the US, we hear that we don’t need to worry about any nasty “terrorists” (jihadists, to use the right word), because they will be vetted.

    We are worrying about the wrong kind of jihad. The “terrorist” is the least of our worries. Instead, we need to concern ourselves about the jihad of the increasing demands and use of Sharia. It is the Sharia that annihilates a native civilization. For an example, before the Sharia, Turkey was a Christian civilization. Today it is 99.7% Muslim. It was jihad that put the Sharia in place, and then, over the centuries, Christianity was annihilated.

    Our vetting needs to focus on the Sharia, not just violence. The US has taken a stand against racial hatred, why not take a stand against Kafir hatred?

    We need to say no to Sharia wife-beating, no to Sharia Kafir hatred, no to the Sharia killing of apostates, no to Sharia suppression of free speech, no to Sharia abuse of women.

    When Islam came to Medina in the first migration, Medina was half Jewish and with some Arab Muslims. Five years later, Medina was totally Islamic and with no Jews. Annihilation by migration and Sharia is pure Sunna.

    Why do we want American citizens who think our Constitution is haram (Sharia forbidden) and that Kafirs are scum? We need to vet all migrants and insist they repudiate political Sharia.

    The oath of citizenship should read: I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, sovereignty, religious legal system of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen;

    Pin It on Pinterest