Descent into Evil

Descent into Evil

Earlier this year, in the Munk Debate on the “refugee” crisis in Europe, I touched on the epidemic of child gang-rape on the Continent and observed that “migrant rights now trump children’s rights”:

The hills are alive …with the sound of child rape

Hijra – doctrine of Islamic Migration

Hijra – doctrine of Islamic Migration

Hijra – doctrine of Islamic Migration

Understanding the dangers of large scale Islamic Migration

Western political elites, aided and abated by mainstream media, are stubbornly clinging on to the narrative that large scale Islamic migration will not change Western societies because Western societies are already multicultural.  Thus Islamic migration will only strengthen the nature of our multicultural societies.  Putting aside the failed, grand multicultural experiment.

Putting aside the failed, grand multicultural experiment, political Islam does not tolerate multiculturalism.  It does not tolerate it because Islam is supremacist and totalitarian in nature.   Political Islam will use the Western doctrine of multiculturalism to its own ends but it does not support multiculturalism.

Dr. Bill Warner on Islamic Migration – Hijra

In this thirty minute video Dr. Warner deals very clearly with the issues around the mass Islamic migration that we are now seeing into the West.  To understand the issues around Islamic mass migration is probably the single most important issue to face our generation.  Yet the dilemma is not concerned  with individual Muslims but with Political Islam.  Islam is political ideology which has a religious aspect to it, but it is not the religious aspect of Islam that is a danger to us, it is its political aspects that are dangerous to Western Civilisation.  This is how we should look at Islam.

Dr. Warner states:

As it does with everything in life, Islam has its own views about migration. For us migration is for an individual’s gain—a better job, for instance. But for Islam, migration was the beginning of Mohammed’s success. He preached the religion for 13 years and converted 150 Arabs to Islam. After he migrated to Medina, he became and politician and jihadist, which led to every Arab in Arabia becoming a Muslim.

After Mohammed’s death, Islam exploded out of Arabia in its second migration. When Islam settles into a society, the society becomes all Islamic (with a couple of exceptions—Spain and the Balkans). Islam does not assimilate, but dominates. This is because of its Sharia law.

The purpose of migration is to start jihad and the purpose of jihad is install the Sharia. Under the Sharia, the other religions are subjected to taxes, domination and humiliation. After enough time, everyone will become a Muslim.

Today in the West, we see the beginning of the annihilation of our civilization due to the deference we pay to Islamic migration and Sharia and we refuse to see the true nature and goals of Islam—complete domination of all aspects of our society.

Originally posted 2016-09-05 14:18:26. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Ayaan Hirsi Ali on Islam’s incompatibility with Western values and why President Trump is correct in his analysis on Islamic immigration

Ayaan Hirsi Ali on Islam’s incompatibility with Western values and why President Trump is correct in his analysis on Islamic immigration

Ayaan Hirsi Ali an introduction 

It is always best to let a person introduce themselves and the following short bio is from her website.  Ayaan Hirsi Ali is one of the most courageous and inspiring people this world has the privilege to know.  Her life’s work deserves our support in whatever way we can give it.  But one of the most important things for us in the West is to listen to her and heed her wisdom (born out of experience).

Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Founder of the AHA Foundation

AHA Foundation Founder, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, is known as a women’s rights activist, champion of free speech, and best-selling author. She is also known as someone who is not afraid to speak out when she feels it necessary.

Ayaan’s journey began in Somalia in 1969 where, as a young girl, she was subjected to female genital mutilation (FGM). From very early on, she questioned the subjugation of women she saw all around her; while listening to a sermon on the many ways women should be obedient to their husbands, she couldn’t resist asking, “Must our husbands obey us too?”

Ayaan’s path led her many places, but upon being forced by her father to marry a distant cousin, she fled to Holland and claimed political asylum. Once there, she worked her way up from being a janitor to serving as an elected member of the Dutch parliament. As a member of parliament, she campaigned to raise awareness of violence against women, including honor killings and FGM, practices that had followed her fellow immigrants into Holland.

In 2004 Ayaan gained international attention following the murder of Theo van Gogh. Van Gogh had directed her short film Submission, a film about the oppression of women under Islam. The assassin left a death threat for her pinned to Van Gogh’s chest. This tragic event, and Ayaan’s life leading up to it, are all chronicled in her best-selling book, Infidel. She is also the author of Caged Virgin, Nomad and most recently another bestseller Heretic: Why Islam Needs Reformation Now.

Ayaan has shown great courage, risking her life to voice the injustice she sees around her. But she has done more than speak out. Ayaan has channeled her life experiences, and the attention she garnered, towards the AHA Foundation. She took tangible action to protect women and girls from the honor violence she herself and so many others she knew faced.

 

 

Merkel Vows Swift Security Enhancements to Combat ‘Most Difficult Trial’ of Terrorism

Merkel Vows Swift Security Enhancements to Combat ‘Most Difficult Trial’ of Terrorism

German Chancellor Angela Merkel records her annual New Year’s speech at the chancellery in Berlin on Dec. 30, 2016.

In an address to mark the new year, German Chancellor Angela Merkel acknowledged that it’s “especially bitter” when refugees commit terrorist attacks, vowing an enhanced focus on the country’s security services in the face of a greater terrorist threat from within.

In addition to a truck plowing into a Berlin market six days before Christmas, Merkel noted other attacks that have made 2016 “a year of difficult trials.”

“Doubtless the most difficult trial is Islamist terrorism, which has been setting its sights on Germany for years now. In 2016 it struck us in the heart of our country: in Würzburg, in Ansbach, and just a few days ago at a Christmas market at the Gedächtniskirche here in Berlin,” she said. “And yes, it is especially bitter and detestable when terrorist attacks are committed by people who came to our country claiming to seek protection, people whom our country was eager to help for this reason, and who have now made a cruel mockery of this helping spirit through their deeds, just as they make a cruel mockery of those who truly need and deserve our protection.”

Still, the chancellor said, she feels “confidence amidst such deep sorrow and grief for the dead and wounded,” in “our resolute determination to counter the terrorists’ world of hate with our compassion and our cohesion.”

“By going on with our lives and our work, we tell the terrorists: you are murderers filled with hatred, but you will not determine how we live or how we want to live. We are free, compassionate and open,” Merkel said. “And with images in our minds of bombed-out Aleppo in Syria, we have to say once again how important and right it was that during the past year, too, our country helped those in true need of our protection find their footing in Germany and integrate into our society.”

“All of this is reflected in our democracy, in our government based on the rule of law, and in our values. They are the counter-project to the hate-filled world of terrorism, and they will be stronger than terrorism. We together are stronger. Our state is stronger.”

The Christian Democratic Union leader, who has been chancellor since 2005 and is consistently ranked the most powerful woman in the world, told Germans that the country “does everything possible to guarantee security and freedom for its citizens.”

“This work is never finished, and this year we have provided a lot of new support to our security agencies. In 2017, the Federal Government will swiftly initiate and implement the necessary measures wherever political or legal changes are needed,” she vowed.

Eight days ago, Merkel ordered a comprehensive review of Germany’s security apparatus in response to anger over what wasn’t done to stop Tunisian Anis Amri, 24, the market terrorist who had been denied asylum but was still in the country and on security services’ radar at the time of the attack.

“The Amri case raises questions – questions that are not only tied to this crime but also to the time before, since he came to Germany in July 2015” from Italy, she said at the time. “We will now intensively examine to what extent official procedures need to be changed.”

The chancellor added that she had spoken with Tunisian President Beji Caid Essebsi and told him deportations of rejected asylum seekers would be “significantly” sped up. Amri’s deportation was reportedly delayed because Tunisia would not claim him.

Merkel also took a shot at Brexit in the new year’s address.

 “Many people also associate the year 2016 with a feeling that the entire world has fallen to pieces or that things that were long considered to be finished achievements have now been called into question. The European Union, for example. Or even parliamentary democracy, which purportedly does not attend to the interests of citizens, but rather serves to benefit only a few. What distorted pictures,” she said.

“Yes, Europe is slow. It is onerous. It has to weather heavy blows like the departure of one of its member states. And yes, Europe should focus on the things that it can truly do better than a nation state. But no, we Germans should never let ourselves be led to believe that a national solo effort could ever bring us a happy future. Where Europe is challenged as a whole – as it is in global competition, in the protection of our external borders, or regarding migration – it must find a response as a whole, however painstaking and tough this may be. And we Germans have every interest in playing a leading role in this.”

In the new year’s Bundestag election, Merkel said she would “champion a political discourse in which we will debate many things vigorously, but will always do so as democrats who never forget that it is an honor to serve our democracy and thereby to serve the people.”

“Cohesion, openness, our democracy and a strong economy that serves the well-being of all: these are the things that make me confident in our future here in Germany, even at the end of a difficult year,” she said. “None of these values are simply given to us. We will have to work for all of them in 2017 too, all of us together, each contributing to the best of our abilities – and this work will be worth it.”

Originally posted 2017-01-03 10:02:59. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Modern Day Trojan Horse:  The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration  (a review with analysis)

Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration (a review with analysis)

Modern Day Trojan Horse:  The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration
By Sam Solomon and Elias Al Maqdisi
ANM Publishers, 2009
139 pp., $14.95

The Hijra

By Janet Levy

Within the past few decades, mosques have increasingly dotted the landscapes of American and European cities and towns, with mega mosques often overshadowing adjacent, centuries-old churches in predominantly Christian regions.  Islamic schools or academies and a host of Muslim organizations have become omnipresent across the West.  

Meanwhile, Americans and Europeans have made countless accommodations to Muslim demands. They have included footbaths; high-decibel, five-times-daily calls to prayer; segregated male-female gym and swimming pool hours; halal food; workplace dispensations for handling pork products and for female head and face coverings; and special, public prayer rooms. Also, shari’ah-compliant financial transactions, the expunging of offensive likenesses of Mohammed or imagined depictions of Arabic characters that connote “Allah,” official swearings-in on Korans in place of customary Bibles, the neutralizing of official descriptive language about Islamists and the jihad, the revision of so-called offensive content in movies and television programs, the removal of representations of pigs from the public sphere, and many other acculturations to Muslim entreaties have all been made in the service of respecting Muslim religious beliefs and practices. 

To those in Western democracies, these accommodating actions appear, on the surface, to be little more than harmless civil gestures, respecting the needs of a growing religion in their midst and welcoming a new addition to their proud, multicultural tradition.  Many Westerners pat themselves on the back for their liberal bent, their tolerance and their open-mindedness. 

Little do they realize that this strategic pattern of demands is part of an insidious, 1,400-year-old proscription for Muslims that originates in the Koran and the Sunnah, the deeds of Mohammed.  It is the Hijra or doctrine of immigration. Modeled by Mohammed’s migration from Mecca to Medina, this immigration is not to a romanticized melting pot wherein newcomers gratefully search for opportunities for a better life in liberty and freely offer their talents and loyalty to benefit their new homeland.  This is immigration for Islamic expansionism employing ethnic separatism to gain special status and privileges within the host country.  Hijra is immigration designed to subvert and subdue non-Muslim societies and pave the way for eventual, total Islamization.

In their compelling book, “Modern Day Trojan Horse:  The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration,” authors Sam Solomon, a former professor of shari’ah law and convert to Christianity, and Elias Al Maqdisi, an expert on Islamic teachings, explain the migration of Muslims to the Dar-al-Harb, the “land of war,” as a religious edict with a basis in Islamic doctrine.  They delineate the step-by-step process of this 1,400-year-old strategy of conquest. It is a transitional strategy which they characterize as the most important step in spreading Islam and preparing for jihad.  From their carefully delineated treatise on Hijra, it is clear that migration in concert with military conquest comprise the bookends of Islamic expansionism. 

Solomon and Al Maqdisi review the phases of the Hijra and its juristic or legal basis in Islamic doctrine.  Under the cover of taquiya or deception, the step-by-step methodology of the migration process is designed to subdue, then, subjugate the host culture, culminating in implementation of shari’ah law. 

The beginning phase of Islamization usually includes activities pivotal to building a physical presence. It consists of public calls to prayer; founding of schools, libraries and research centers; and the teaching of Arabic — actions that appear to be reasonable and respectable infrastructure requirements necessary to support the presence of a faith.  At this point in the Hijra, it is permissible for Muslims to engage in haram, or forbidden actions, out of necessity to establish and empower the umma or Muslim community.  Koranic rules such as the prohibition against friendships with infidels are suspended while the objectives of future Islamization are systematically put into place. In its initial phase, the Hijra passes scrutiny by the West whose citizens erroneously view the migration as mainly economic — a pilgrimage for a better life.

Solomon and Maqdisi examine the comprehensive strategy that begins with the establishment of the umma or Muslim community. The mosque becomes the locus of power, a strategic base and the center of all activities.  They explain how in this embryonic phase, a top priority is the scouting for new arrivals to expand and empower the existing Muslim community.  Muslim leaders offer solicitous assistance and helpful suggestions for schools, housing, mosque worship, halal markets and other services to ingratiate themselves with new arrivals and bring them into the local Muslim community.  Agents of local mosques, ever alert for new immigrants and potential converts, engage in subtle forms of indoctrination and police local Muslims.

This first step of establishing the mosque as the center of local Islamic life and activities is mistakenly viewed by non-Muslims as merely the benign construction of houses of worship.  Its true goal escapes notice, that of firmly establishing a purposeful non-integrated Muslim identity to advance the goal of Islamization.

Once the consolidation of the Muslim community occurs under the radar, the purposeful fight for special status and shari’ah follows. As dictated by the Koran and Sunnah, segregation from non-Muslims is a natural outcome of the advancement of the Hijra. 

Visible changes begin to be apparent as the Muslim population achieves more of a critical mass.  Over time, the dress code, often beginning with a hijab in segregated enclaves and moving toward the complete covering of a neqab in the public sphere, separates Muslim women from men and from non-Muslim women.  Eventually, as the host population becomes familiarized with what they believe to be the requirements of religious piety, demands are made for segregation at public facilities, in the workplace and at schools and universities. Requests for halal food, shari’ah-compliant financial transactions and the addition of Muslim holidays to public calendars further elevate the Muslim community with a special status making them separate and distinct. 

All demands are initially presented as benign attempts to accommodate the religious requirements of devout Muslims. Any actions to suppress them are decried as religious discrimination.  In the United States, requests for separate swimming and gym hours for Muslim men and women, demands for identification photos for licenses for women wearing hijabs and refusals to handle pork products or don immodest dress in the workplace have appeared.  At this point, representatives of the Muslim community are often working cooperatively with the host government to bring about change.  As Solomon and Maqdisi explain, the idea is to get the host society accustomed to Muslim buildings, customs, holidays, dress and food.  Newcomers are encouraged by Muslim leadership to become citizens, vote and run for political office to increase the umma’s influence.

At the university level, students are indoctrinated to become advocates for Islam, engage in interfaith activities and da’wa or proselytization and train for jihad.  Non-Muslims professors are solicited through zakat or payments to present courses favorable to Islam and write and speak publicly to promote Islam. The bequeathal by Saudi Prince Al-waleed bin Talal of $20 million dollars for Islamic study centers at Harvard and Georgetown universities, respectively, was a gesture to insure the promulgation of positive research, publications and presentations toward Islam.  

In “Modern Day Trojan Horse,” Solomon and Maqdisi point out that as Muslims gain power and mass in the host country, consolidation of identity occurs, as well as strengthening of their infrastructure of mosques, schools, clubs, organizations and media.  The doctrine of taquiya is firmly in place as Muslims hide behind the dictates of their religious devotion and seek cultural changes in the land of the non-Muslim or kuffar.  At this more advanced stage, attempts are made to silence opponents and curry favor. The judicious use of zakat elicits favorable views of Muslims and Islam from politicians, representatives from the media and other organizations.  For example, within the last couple of years in the United States, the words, “jihad” and “Islamofascism,” have been expunged from the lexicon of government officials and the words, “Islamic” and “terrorism,” are rarely paired.  In Europe, which is further advanced in this process, a dangerous turn materialized with the murder of filmmaker ,Theo Van Gogh, who produced a film on the subjugation of women in Islam, and with death threats against Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilder for his outspoken criticism of Islam.

As Islamization of the host culture proceeds apace, preparations begin for learning the skills necessary for jihad.  Young jihadists may travel to their countries of origin for further indoctrination and terrorist training.  This development has been noted within Somali Muslim communities in Minnesota and Tennessee. Young Muslims have disappeared to Somalia to rendezvous with Al Shabaab, a terrorist group linked to Al Qaeda.

As the resident Muslim community becomes more established and begins to wield considerable power in the political arena, pressure is brought to bear on politicians to permit shari’ah law courts in exchange for Muslim votes.  This is very much evident in Britain where parallel systems of legal jurisprudence currently coexist.  Muslim inhabitants of the host country are pressured to follow shari’ah law in lieu of the prevailing legal system.  Several recent legal decisions by non-Muslim judges in Europe have referenced shari’ah law as a standard for verdicts concerning Muslims.

As the intensity of the hijra advances, the appearance of open ghettos or Muslim-only regions occurs.  These are areas where non-Muslims are essentially prohibited and where, if they enter, they actually may be physically threatened.  Such no-go zones, where even non-Muslim community workers are unwelcome, exist throughout Europe today.  Remarkably, Muslim movements are never restricted; they venture freely anywhere in the host country. 

As Solomon and Maqdisi point out, the Hijra is a comprehensive and direct political attempt to undermine the culture and values of the host country and replace them with Islam and shari’ah.  It is an insidious migration seeking transformation of the culture, behaviors, customs, rules and laws of a host society to spread Islam and establish an Islamic state.  The stages of the Hijra are very much evident in varying degrees in all Western societies today.  Ironically, our open democratic societies with constitutionally mandated freedoms of speech, religion and assembly have facilitated this march toward the very demise of our way of life. 

“Modern Day Trojan Horse” should be required reading for all citizens of Western democracies who urgently need to understand the Hijra and the threat it represents.  The book sounds the alarm for the cautious evaluation of what may appear to be innocent religious practice in our midst but has sinister motives to transform our societies forever.

 

The Hijra: the Islamic doctrine of immigration

The Hijra: the Islamic doctrine of immigration

Posted by Ann Corcoran on August 16, 2009

I can’t emphasize enough the importance of reading this brilliant article by Janet Levy today at the American Thinker.  It is without a doubt the most significant and concise description I have ever read to describe the expansion of Islam throughout the western world and why it is happening.

Levy begins her review of  “Modern Day Trojan Horse: The Islamic Doctrine of Immigration” by Sam Solomon and Elias Al Maqdisi as follows.  Does this sound familiar?

Within the past few decades, mosques have increasingly dotted the landscapes of American and European cities and towns, with mega mosques often overshadowing adjacent, centuries-old churches in predominantly Christian regions. Islamic schools or academies and a host of Muslim organizations have become omnipresent across the West.

Meanwhile, Americans and Europeans have made countless accommodations to Muslim demands. They have included footbaths; high-decibel, five-times-daily calls to prayer; segregated male-female gym and swimming pool hours; halal food; workplace dispensations for handling pork products and for female head and face coverings; and special, public prayer rooms. Also, shari’ah-compliant financial transactions, the expunging of offensive likenesses of Mohammed or imagined depictions of Arabic characters that connote “Allah,” official swearings-in on Korans in place of customary Bibles, the neutralizing of official descriptive language about Islamists and the jihad, the revision of so-called offensive content in movies and television programs, the removal of representations of pigs from the public sphere, and many other acculturations to Muslim entreaties have all been made in the service of respecting Muslim religious beliefs and practices.

To those in Western democracies, these accommodating actions appear, on the surface, to be little more than harmless civil gestures, respecting the needs of a growing religion in their midst and welcoming a new addition to their proud, multicultural tradition. Many Westerners pat themselves on the back for their liberal bent, their tolerance and their open-mindedness.

Little do they realize that this strategic pattern of demands is part of an insidious, 1,400-year-old proscription for Muslims that originates in the Koran and the Sunnah, the deeds of Mohammed. It is the Hijra or doctrine of immigration. Modeled by Mohammed’s migration from Mecca to Medina, this immigration is not to a romanticized melting pot wherein newcomers gratefully search for opportunities for a better life in liberty and freely offer their talents and loyalty to benefit their new homeland. This is immigration for Islamic expansionism employing ethnic separatism to gain special status and privileges within the host country. Hijra is immigration designed to subvert and subdue non-Muslim societies and pave the way for eventual, total Islamization.

Please continue reading at American Thinker.

Update:   Here is an article from Maine that demonstrates exactly what Janet is saying.

CAIR – Congress no need to look for Islamic Terrorists wishing to enter the country

CAIR – Congress no need to look for Islamic Terrorists wishing to enter the country

It seems that CAIR is above the law and it knows it.  This no doubt has connection to their call to all Americans to pressurise their elected representatives not to support the new Visa legislation.  Not only are they actively promoting sharia but are also seeking to dictate what laws are actually made by American legislators.  Good bye American freedoms and the American way of life, welcome sharia and Islamic governance.

CAIR – Congress no need to look for Islamic Terrorists wishing to enter the country

The destruction of America from within – the Muslim Brotherhood

CAIR to Muslims: Defy Customs Agents, Breitbart, June 2, 2016 (THE UNITED WEST) The Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) has called on Muslims to openly defy U.S. Customs Agents when questioned on travel from Islamic controlled countries by saying, “None of your Damn Business.” Hassan Shibly (Executive Director CAIR, Florida) also encourages Muslims to agitate […]

via CAIR to Muslims: Defy Customs Agents —

Originally posted 2016-06-04 21:45:22. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

The Islamist Infiltration of Europe

The Islamist Infiltration of Europe

The Islamist Infiltration of Europe

Angela Merkel admits about refugees what everyone has known all along.

BY Immanuel Al-Manteeqi · @Al_Manteeqi |

German Chancellor Angela Merkel has recently admitted that terrorists have managed to infiltrate Europe by passing themselves off as refugees. She said that “in part, the refugee flow was even used to smuggle terrorists.”

This comes as no surprise to those critics of Europe’s massive influx of Muslim immigrants. Indeed, upon hearing the news, many are no doubt jumping out of their seats yelling, “we told you so!”

Just this last May, Neue Osnabrücke Zeitung, a German news source, reported that Germany’s Federal Criminal Police Office (BKA) has received 369 tip-offs on possible links between refugees and Muslim extremists. German police announced that at least forty asylum seekers were being investigated for alleged terrorism links. It was reported that Germany’s spy chief, Hans Georg Maassen, said that Germany’s domestic intelligence agency had obtained “strong evidence that… 17 people have arrived under Islamic State instructions.” [Emphasis added.]  Furthermore, last month, German authorities announced that 499 Islamists were under surveillance, ostensibly because there is credible evidence that they pose a threat.  It is not clear if this figure also includes homegrown Islamists.

So we now know for certain that some Islamist terrorists have taken advantage of the massive influx of refugees and have successfully infiltrated Europe — and on ISIS’ orders. Furthermore, there are undoubtedly even more pending investigations, and it is certain that many Islamist terrorist cells with refugee connections are operating within Europe as of this writing.

Consequences of Mass-Muslim Immigration

More than a million immigrants have immigrated to Europe since the beginning of the Syrian civil war. According to the UN Refugee Agency, about 240,000 arrived thus far in 2016. The influx of refugees is not over despite the European Union’s agreement with Turkey. Most refugees are arriving by boat, some by land, and (it seems) hardly any by plane. The International Organization for Migration (IOM) estimates that more than a million arrived by sea in 2015, whereas only about 35,000 arrived by land. Most of the European migrants are ending up in either Germany, Sweden, or Hungary.[1] Some European countries like Bulgaria have constructed large fences to keep out the refugees attempting to enter Europe by land.

Originally posted 2016-12-27 20:07:50. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

EMPTY HEADS OF STATE – In this time of crisis, some European leaders are braver than others

EMPTY HEADS OF STATE – In this time of crisis, some European leaders are braver than others

By Bruce Bawer

It’s been hard to keep track of all the acts of jihadist terror that have struck Western Europe in 2016, let alone the sundry smaller-scale atrocities – from gang rapes of children to stabbings of defenseless old women – that have been committed by Muslim men and boys. And then, of course, there’s the rise in dhimmitude that has accompanied all these developments – the public events scaled back or canceled, the churches that have removed crosses, and the other efforts on every imaginable front to appease the Prophet’s followers by gradually erasing Europe’s cultural traditions. From Bradford to Brussels, from Malmö to Marseilles, fear and anger have soared; in the face of a pusillanimous political establishment, more and more voters in a range of countries have been looking elsewhere for true leadership.

(more…)

Originally posted 2017-01-04 01:22:13. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

The Muslim Man’s Sexual “Rights” Over Non-Muslim Women

The Muslim Man’s Sexual “Rights” Over Non-Muslim Women

 

In word and deed, in Islamic and non-Islamic nations, Muslim men appear to think that non-Muslim women—impure “infidels”—exist solely to gratify their sexual urges.

 First, consider the beliefs and actions of those committed to waging jihad for the cause of Allah, such as the Islamic State:

In the moments before he raped the 12-year-old [non-Muslim] girl, the Islamic State fighter took the time to explain that what he was about to do was not a sin. Because the preteen girl practiced a religion other than Islam, the Quran not only gave him the right to rape her — it condoned and encouraged it, he insisted. He bound her hands and gagged her. Then he knelt beside the bed and prostrated himself in prayer before getting on top of her. When it was over, he knelt to pray again, bookending the rape with acts of religious devotion. “I kept telling him it hurts — please stop,” said the girl, whose body is so small an adult could circle her waist with two hands. “He told me that according to Islam he is allowed to rape an unbeliever. He said that by raping me, he is drawing closer to” Allah.

Yet such behavior is not limited to fanatical jihadis, who have “nothing whatsoever to do with Islam,” as most fools and liars will assure us; rather it permeates the totality of Islamic culture.

Consider recent events in Pakistan: three Christian girls walking home after a hard day’s work were accosted by four “rich and drunk” Muslims—hardly ISIS candidates—in a car. They “misbehaved,” yelled “suggestive and lewd comments,” and harassed the girls to get in their car for “a ride and some fun.” When the girls declined the “invitation,” adding that they were “devout Christians and did not practice sex outside of marriage,” the men became enraged and chased the girls, yelling, “How dare you run away from us, Christian girls are only meant for one thing: the pleasure of Muslim men.”  They drove their car into the three girls, killing one and severely injuring the other two.

Or consider the words of human rights activists speaking about another Muslim man’s rape of a 9-year-old Christian girl: “Such incidents occur frequently. Christian girls are considered goods to be damaged at leisure. Abusing them is a right. According to the community’s mentality it is not even a crime. Muslims regard them as spoils of war.”

Once relegated to third world countries like Pakistan and ISIS-controlled areas, the subhuman treatment and sexual abuse of “infidel” women is becoming a common fixture in the West.

Thus recently in Germany, a group of Muslim “refugees” stalked a 25-year-old woman at night, hurled “filthy” insults and taunted her for sex.  One told her that “German women are there for sex,” before reaching into her blouse and trousers and groping her.

These recent stories from Germany and Pakistan are identical—Muslim men harassing non-Muslim women on the assumption that it’s their Islamic right and privilege—except for one difference: the German “infidel” escaped with her life, whereas the Pakistani “infidel” was murdered for refusing to gratify the sexual desires of her Islamic accosters.  As Islam’s presence continues to grow in Europe, this difference will quickly fade.

Already there are other, more subtle similarities between “third world” Pakistan and “first world” Germany.  In the report about the manslaughter of the three Christian girls in Pakistan, we find that “Other girls in the local area are now too scared to travel at night and are being accompanied by the men in their families.”  In Germany, “The latest reports from Dortmund [where the “German-women-are-there-for-sex” anecdote transpired] paint a terrifying picture of a city where it is now unsafe for women to go out at night for fear of being attacked and raped by refugees.”

Indeed, less than a month earlier, on New Year’s Eve, 1,000 Muslim migrants, also apparently thinking that non-Muslim women exist for one thing, went on a raping spree in Cologne and elsewhere, leaving hundreds of “infidel” women violated, beaten, and traumatized—the same way “infidel” women living in Muslim-majority nations often feel.

Of course, well before the migrant crisis, Europe had and ignored ample lessons concerning what happens when Muslim populations grow.   In Britain alone, where a large Muslim minority has long existed, countless British girls in various regions have been sexually abused and gang raped by Muslims who apparently deemed it their Islamic right.  Said one rape victim: “The men who did this to me have no remorse. They would tell me that what they were doing was OK in their culture.”   Days ago a judge told 12 Muslim men that they “took such terrible and heartless sexual advantage” of a 13-year-old British girl before sentencing them.

A Muslim imam in Britain confessed that Muslim men are taught that women are “second-class citizens, little more than chattels or possessions over whom they have absolute authority” and that the imams preach a doctrine “that denigrates all women, but treats whites [meaning non-Muslims] with particular contempt.”

Another Muslim convicted of rape in a separate case told a British court that sharing non-Muslim girls for sex “was part of Somali culture” and “a religious requirement.”

And there it is: Whether seen by “pious” Muslims as a “religious requirement”—as cited by an ISIS rapist to his 12-year-old victim—or whether seen as part of Pakistani (Asian) and Somali (African) culture—that is, Islamic culture—the subhuman treatment and sexual degradation of non-Muslim women and children by Muslims who deem it their “right” is apparently another “exoticism” the West must embrace if it wishes to keep worshipping at the altar of multiculturalism.

Update, Feb. 10: “An Algerian man who almost killed his 25-year-old student victim shouted out ‘if Allah wills it’ in Arabic as he raped her in a darkened alley, a court has heard.  The man, identified only by his first name Rheda, is accused of following the student as she walked home from a nightclub at 5am in Hannover, Germany.  Afterwards, with his victim badly beaten, he is alleged to have climbed off her and asked her if she enjoyed it.”

Originally posted 2017-01-02 01:50:40. Republished by Blog Post Promoter

Pin It on Pinterest