Sharia and the destruction of Western Civilisation
What has disappointed in the recent Presidential debates is the total lack of focus on Clinton’s open border policy. Hopefully it will come up in the third debate as this is one of the most significant dangers that is facing the West today. Clinton stated that she is committed to a borderless society and plans to introduce 65,000 Syrian refugees next year (just the start) into America. They are already flooding into Europe in an unstoppable tide (unstoppable because the European elite does not have the will to stop it. Easter European countries like Hungry and Poland are saying no to this tide because they recognise the dangers.
Easter European countries like Hungry and Poland are saying no to this tide because they recognise the dangers. The UK are saying no to it because of BREXIT but voices within the political elite (Jeremy Corbyn the Labour leader for example). Clinton sets Merkel in Germany as an example to follow and someone she admires – her favourite world leader no less. Merkel, Corbyn and Clinton will plunge the West into a battle for identity never seen before in our history. Western Europe is now seeing the fruits of Merkel’s open border policy and if the current trend continues Europe is on course for major cultural conflict. Yet this seems to be what the left wants, as their hatred for the West’s cultural roots seems unbounded. Roots that are grounded in Judeo-Christian values.
Jihad is terrible but not the main danger we face
The more you read about Islamic history the more you realise that the real danger in mass Islamic migration is the imposition of sharia law. It is sharia that destroys cultures and a people’s identity. Dr Warners short video illustrates this and should lead us to look at the subject in more detail.
As Syrian refugees and other migrants are being brought to the US, we hear that we don’t need to worry about any nasty “terrorists” (jihadists, to use the right word), because they will be vetted.
We are worrying about the wrong kind of jihad. The “terrorist” is the least of our worries. Instead, we need to concern ourselves about the jihad of the increasing demands and use of Sharia. It is the Sharia that annihilates a native civilization. For an example, before the Sharia, Turkey was a Christian civilization. Today it is 99.7% Muslim. It was jihad that put the Sharia in place, and then, over the centuries, Christianity was annihilated.
Our vetting needs to focus on the Sharia, not just violence. The US has taken a stand against racial hatred, why not take a stand against Kafir hatred?
We need to say no to Sharia wife-beating, no to Sharia Kafir hatred, no to the Sharia killing of apostates, no to Sharia suppression of free speech, no to Sharia abuse of women.
When Islam came to Medina in the first migration, Medina was half Jewish and with some Arab Muslims. Five years later, Medina was totally Islamic and with no Jews. Annihilation by migration and Sharia is pure Sunna.
Why do we want American citizens who think our Constitution is haram (Sharia forbidden) and that Kafirs are scum? We need to vet all migrants and insist they repudiate political Sharia.
The oath of citizenship should read: I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, sovereignty, religious legal system of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen;